Ventromedial prefrontal cortex CRF1 receptors modulate the tachycardic activity of baroreflex.

Ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vMPFC) glutamatergic neurotransmission has a facilitatory role on cardiac baroreflex activity which is mediated by NMDA receptors activation. Corticotrophin releasing factor receptors type1 and 2 (CRF1 and CRF2), present in the vMPFC, are colocalized in neurons containing glutamate vesicles, suggesting that such receptors may be involved in glutamate release in this cortical area. Therefore, our hypothesis is that the CRF1 and CRF2 receptors can modulate the baroreflex bradycardic and tachycardic responses. In order to prove this assumption, male Wistar rats had bilateral stainless steel guide cannula implanted into the vMPFC, and baroreflex was activated by intravenous infusion of phenylephrine or sodium nitroprusside through a vein catheter. A second catheter was implanted into the femoral artery for cardiovascular measurements. The CRF1 receptor antagonist administration in either infralimbic cortex (IL) or prelimbic cortex (PL), vMPFC regions, was unable to change the bradycardic responses but increased the slope of the baroreflex tachycardic activity. Microinjection of the CRF2 receptor antagonist into the IL and PL did not alter ether bradycardic nor tachycardic baroreflex responses. The administration of the non-selective CRF receptors agonist, urocortin in these areas, did not modify bradycardic responses but decreased tachycardia slope of the baroreflex. CRF1 receptor antagonist administration prior to non-selective CRF agonist in vMPFC prevented the tachycardic responses reduction. However, CRF2 receptor antagonism could not prevent the effect of CRF receptors agonist. These results suggest that IL and PL CRF1 but not CRF2 receptors have an inhibitory role on the baroreflex tachycardic activity. Furthermore, they have no influence on baroreflex bradycardic activity.

Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis modulates baroreflex cardiac activity: an interaction between alpha-1 receptors and NMDA/nitric oxide pathway.

The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) is a forebrain structure, involved in the modulation of neuroendocrine, cardiovascular and autonomic responses. One of the responses is baroreflex activity, which consists in a neural mechanism responsible for keeping the blood pressure within a narrow range of variation. It has been reported that blockade of BNST α1-adrenoceptors increased the bradycardic component of baroreflex. In addition, such receptors are able to modulate glutamate release in this structure. Interestingly, BNST NMDA receptor antagonism and neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) inhibition led to the same effect of the α1-adrenoceptors blockade on baroreflex bradycardic response. Therefore, the hypothesis of the present study is that BNST noradrenergic transmission interacts with NMDA/NO pathway through α1 adrenoceptors to modulate the baroreflex activity. Male Wistar rats had stainless steel guide cannulas bilaterally implanted in the BNST. Subsequently, a catheter was inserted into the femoral artery for cardiovascular recordings, and into the femoral vein for assessing baroreflex activation. Injection of the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor reboxetine in the BNST did not modify the tachycardic, but significantly decreased the bradycardic component of baroreflex. Administration of an α1, but not an α2 antagonist into the BNST prior to reboxetine prevented this effect. Likewise, previous injection of NMDA/NO pathway blockers inhibited the effect of reboxetine on bradycardic response. In conclusion, it was demonstrated for the first time the existence of an interaction between BNST noradrenergic, glutamatergic and nitrergic neurotransmissions in the modulation of bradycardic baroreflex response.

Differential modulation of the contextual conditioned emotional response by CB1 and TRPV1 receptors in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex: Possible involvement of NMDA/nitric oxide-related mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: Blockade of cannabinoid CB1 or vanilloid TRPV1 receptors in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex of rats respectively increases or decreases the conditioned emotional response during re-exposure to a context previously paired with footshocks. Although these mechanisms are unknown, they may involve local modulation of glutamatergic and nitrergic signaling. AIM: We investigated whether these mechanisms are involved in the reported effects of CB1 and TRPV1 modulation in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. METHODS: Freezing behavior and autonomic parameters were recorded during the conditioned response expression. RESULTS: The CB1 receptors antagonist NIDA, or the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin (CPS) in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex increased the conditioned emotional response expression, and these effects were prevented by TRPV1 and CB1 antagonism, respectively. The increased conditioned emotional response evoked by NIDA and CPS were prevented by an NMDA antagonist or a neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitor. A nitric oxide scavenger or a soluble guanylate cyclase inhibitor prevented only the NIDA effects and the CPS effect was prevented by a non-selective antioxidant drug, as nitric oxide can also induce reactive oxygen species production. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that CB1 and TRPV1 receptors in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex differently modulate the expression of conditioned emotional response through glutamatergic and nitrergic mechanisms, although different pathways may be involved.